Open source software vs microsoft empire essay

Freedom Can Be Slavery You know, if one person, just one person does it, they may think he's really sick and they won't take him. And if two people do it And if three people do it!

Open source software vs microsoft empire essay

By Charlie Stross There has been some Firstly, the Apple vs. Secondly, Hewlett-Packard are buying Palmapparently for Palm's WebOS — with rumours of plans to deploy a range of WebOS tablets to rival the iPad — at the same time, they're killing their forthcoming Windows 7 slatejust as Microsoft are killing the Courier tablet project.

Finally, gizmodo not, perhaps, an unbiased source in this regard given current events have a fun essay discussing Apple's Worldwide Loyalty Teamthe internal unit tasked with hunting down and stopping leaks.

59 Responses

It's probably no exaggeration to say that Apple's draconian security policies are among the tightest of any company operating purely in the private sector, with a focus on secrecy that rivals that of military contractors.

But even so, the control freak obsessiveness which Steve Jobs is bringing to bear on the iPad — and the desperate flailing around evident among Apple's competitors — bears some examination. I've got a theory, and it's this: HP have woken up and smelled the forest fire, two or three years late; Microsoft are mired in a tar pit, unable to grasp that the inferno heading towards them is going to burn down the entire ecosystem in which they exist.

Open source software vs microsoft empire essay

There is the smell of panic in the air, and here's why We have known since the mids that the internet was the future of computing. With increasing bandwidth, data doesn't need Open source software vs microsoft empire essay be trapped in the hard drives of our desktop computers: Modem uptake drove dot-com 1.

Now everyone is anticipating what you might call dot-com 3. Wifi and 4G protocols will shortly be delivering mbps to whatever gizmo is in your pocket, over the air. It's about as fast as my cable modem connection was in A lot has been said about how expensive it is to boost the speed of fibre networks.

The USA has some of the worst domestic broadband in the developed world, because it's delivered over cables that were installed early — premature infrastructure may give your economy a leg up in the early years, but handicaps you down the line — but a shift to high-bandwidth wireless will make up the gap, assuming the frequencies are available see also: It's easier to lay a single fat fibre to a radio transciever station than it is to lay lots of thin fibres to everybody's front door, after all.

Anyway, here's Steve Jobs' strategic dilemma in a nutshell: PCs are becoming commodity items. Apple has so far survived this collapse in profitability by aiming at the premium end of the market — if they were an auto manufacturer, they'd be Mercedes, BMW, Porsche and Jaguar rolled into one.

But nevertheless, the underlying prices are dropping. Moreover, the PC revolution has saturated the market at any accessible price point. That is, anyone who needs and can afford a PC has now got one. Elsewhere, in the developing world, the market is still growing — but it's at the bottom end of the price pyramid, with margins squeezed down to nothing.

At the same time, wireless broadband is coming. As it does so, organizations and users will increasingly move their data out into the cloud read: Software will be delivered as a service to users wherever they are, via whatever device they're looking at — their phone, laptop, tablet, the TV, a direct brain implant, whatever.

Well, it's what everyone believes — everyone in the industry, anyway.

Academia vs Industry: an Updated Opinion | ScienceBlogs

Because it offers a way to continue to make money, by selling software as a service, despite the cost of the hardware exponentially dropping towards zero.

And, oh, it lets you outsource a lot of annoying shitty admin tasks like disk management, backup, anti-virus, and so on. My take on the iPhone OS, and the iPad, isn't just that they're the start of a whole new range of Apple computers that have a user interface as radically different from their predecessors as the original Macintosh was from previous command-line PCs.

Rather, they're a hugely ambitious attempt to keep Apple relevant to the future of computing, once Moore's law tapers off and the personal computer industry craters and turns into a profitability wasteland.

Even if he's reduced to giving the machines away, as long as he can charge rent for access to data or apps he's got a business model. He can also maintain quality whatever that isexclude malware, and beat off rivals.

A well-cultivated app store is actually a customer draw. It's also a powerful tool for promoting the operating system the apps run on. Operating system, hardware platform, and apps define an ecosystem.

Apple are trying desperately to force the growth of a new ecosystem — one that rivals the year-old Macintosh environment — to maturity in five years flat. That's the time scale in which they expect the cloud computing revolution to flatten the existing PC industry.

Unless they can turn themselves into an entirely different kind of corporation by Apple is doomed to the same irrelevance as the rest of the PC industry — interchangable suppliers of commodity equipment assembled on a shoestring budget with negligable profit.

Signs of the Macpocalypse abound. Mac apps need not apply; they don't contribute to Apple's new walled garden ecosystem.

Latest Stories

Any threat to the growth of the app store software platform is going to be resisted, vigorously, at this stage. Steve Jobs undoubtedly believes what he or an assistant wrote in his thoughts on flash:I had my english teacher edit my essay and he told me, "Philip this is really good, nice job".

So here I am expecting to get an A on the essay and I was super excited. I get the grade back and its a C. They range from open source to several thousands of dollars per seat. Open source is a term used to describe software that is freely available, along with the software code used to create it.

“Battlefield V” isn’t without reasons to recommend it. But the impression that it leaves is a game that isn’t quite ready. Free Software/Open Source never did kill off proprietary software, or take over the desktop (or if it does, it will be just as the desktop becomes irrelevant), but it did provide a vital counterweight to Microsoft.

You just clipped your first slide! Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later. Now customize the name of a clipboard to store your clips. Conclusion. Clearly there are benefits to the RetroN 5 being "only a glorified emulator".

Those who don't see the point in the system will not be convinced by the fantastic video output, the impressive software compatibility or the versatility on offer by playing the ROM files rather than the cartridges.

Before You Get Too Excited About That GitHub Study… | Slate Star Codex