All the tragic gun violence-related events that took place recently and not so recently led not only to grief but to all sorts of speculation on all levels. The topic has become so widely discussed that everyone has something to say on it: So, given the actuality of the issue, it is only logical that students are often given assignments to write gun control essay, to investigate this pressing question, and to share their opinions in this regard.
Make Sure You Know Your Gun Control Arguments For and Against Share The gun control debate is fueled by opposing sentiments, between those who support gun rights and individuals with anti gun sentiments. The arguments are rooted in different philosophical applications as well as statistics and facts regarding how firearms can impact society.
It is important to keep mind that even though there are strong and valid points to be made for both sides of gun control issues, this has proven to be one of the most debated Gun control in wisconsin essay intense battles that has been fought on the political forefront. Though minor advances and pitfalls have been taken by both factions, the debate of gun control issues is one that is still deadlocked, and will probably continue to remain stagnant in taking significant steps toward either side of the argument.
At the crux at both arguments are underlying questions as to what is to be ultimately accomplished in choosing either side of the debate. Firstly, how are firearm restrictions to be implemented without violating the Second Amendment of the Constitution is one that is considered central in terms of political and legislative in determining how to approach gun control issues.
Secondly, a more recently considered aspect is how gun control limit or restrict crime, if at all. Empirical evidence and statistical facts have proven valid points for both sides of gun control issues, making it extremely difficult to determine an obvious effect or answer.
The right to bear arms has proven to be somewhat of a thorn in the side of the gun control debate for both sides, but particular those who favor gun control. Anti gun control factions are unwavering when it comes to interpretations of the Second Amendment that do not coincide word for word as it is written in the Bill of Rights.
The National Rifle Association and the Gun Owners of America are two groups that defend the constitutional provision with all of their resources.
Gun control activists will often pose three concepts regarding the Second Amendment as it is written: The provision is outdated and obsolete; furthermore, its ambiguity lends for confusion and different means for interpretations of the provision, and must therefore, be amended to coincide with the times and be more explicit or simply be eradicated.
Regarding the inclusion of "regulated militia," arms are to be kept for the sole purpose of defense of tyranny or militaristic attempt by the government to suppress the people.
To that extent, firearms should otherwise be restricted from other uses with few exceptions.
The right to bear arms is not absolute; it should be subject to regulation under certain requirements, such as when the commonwealth may be possibly threatened. This provision does not support the use of military-style weapons--such as semi- and fully automatic weapons--by regular civilians because they are not needed in the realms of self-defense and protection or hunting and recreational use.
Though this interpretation may serve to have applied logic in an organized and well-thought out manner, anti gun control supporters will claim that the violation of the Second Amendment is a reason why such a clause was introduced in the Constitution; for the people to protect themselves from any form of violation of civil liberties and freedoms.
Though the interpretation of the right to bear arms is subject to bias and convenience, the arguments posed by each faction have strong and valid points that must be considered to the full extent in order to understand all of the gun control issues.
One of the arguments that is getting the most attention in recent times is gun violence and children or minors. Whether it would be that children have access to firearms and acquire them with malicious purpose or intention to commit a crime, or simply accidental discharge of a weapon by a small child finding a parents handgun and playing with it, firearms are becoming more of a serious concern in regards to children finding ways to get their hands on them.
Events as the Columbine High School and Virginia Tech shooting made this argument become more of a national awareness of the gun violence by young people.
Gun control supporters subsequently rallied to propose more restrictions and laws to further limit the availability of firearms. Anti gun control factions responded by making it a responsibility for parents to educate their families of the dangers of firearms and guns, particularly if they were firearm owners themselves.
They claimed that laws and regulations would not bar children from acquiring guns if the education was not there in the first place.
Though certain provisions may be taken, such as storing guns in gun safes or applying trigger locks to the weapons, it is more important to educate people about firearms, especially children.
Anti gun control supporters stressed that it is the responsibility of the parents to educate their children about guns, and even go as far as teaching them how to appropriately handle firearms so as the can develop a personal sense of fear and respect for them, ant not regard them as toys.
Another common argument posed by gun control activists is that the government has a duty to society and the people to keep firearms away from those individuals that should never be in possession of firearms.
There are already laws in place listing restrictions placed on certain people, such as convicted felons, that prohibit their possession, purchasing, and carrying of firearms.Gun control is a large controversy throughout the United states, but in Wisconsin, there is much debate on what should be done.
Michael Steele once said, “You can have all the gun control laws in the country, but if you don't enforce them, people are going to find a way to protect themselves. Gun control essay conclusion letter. Dbq essay ap world history slavery in wisconsin Essay on my visit to amusement park essay writing professional memos essay over the beatles literary essay love in the time of cholera tina tessaya vorgangsbeschreibung 4 klasse beispiel essay font size for college essay thousand pieces of gold essay.
For example, Wisconsin, with sparse gun control laws, in the beginning of the year had four hundred thirty-two firearm deaths per , people (CNN). In comparison, New Jersey, with a fair amount of gun control laws, had only three hundred forty-one deaths per , people (CNN).
View gun control essay from WBIS at University of Wisconsin, Oshkosh. The term Gun Control refers to the policy enforced by a particular nation or authority to control or define the limits on use. The Case for More Guns (and More Gun Control) Jeffrey Goldberg is the editor in chief of The Atlantic and a recipient of the National Magazine Award for Reporting.
A Perfect Argumentative Essay on Gun Control In recent times, the issue of gun control has become an increasingly heated topic. Whenever a national tragedy occurs that involves gun violence, the question on what to do about America’s gun control takes center stage.