The first section includes an introduction explaining the effects of police corruption from rapes to murder and how it impacts society. It also expresses the need to act, as the United States becomes more like the exceedingly corrupt African countries of Nigeria and South Africa. Comparison of other countries reveals a lack of authority and government as well as public safety concerns.
Police Corruption Essay Police Corruption Essay Historically, police corruption has been a persisting, serious, and in some cases pervasive feature of police services. Corruption can be seen as a kind of occupational hazard for police, with the nature of police work offering an unusually large number of opportunities for corrupt behavior.
Moreover, features of police organization have acted to undermine the disposition to decline such opportunities. Reducing police corruption requires the development of integrity systems for police services, which function to minimize the attractiveness of corrupt behavior and reinforce and develop the disposition to act in a morally upright manner.
Defining Police Corruption Corruption is a process of subversion or corrosion Essay police corruption causes a noncorrupt, pure, or ideal state of affairs. While there are broadly accepted paradigm cases of police corruption, such as accepting bribes for overlooking criminal behavior, or even engaging in such Essay police corruption causes, there is less consensus about how to define police corruption.
Accounts of police corruption tend to splinter along two lines.
First, there are differences about the role of police, and hence of the ideal that provides the contrast against which police corruption is identified. Some theories of policing argue that the primary function of police is to enforce the law; others that it is to protect rights; others again that it is to use force, or the threat of force, to deal with emergencies that no one else can handle.
Since different theories of policing give different accounts of what an ideal police service looks like, they will also differ, at least to some extent, about what counts as police corruption.
Nevertheless, while not all theories hold that the defining purpose of policing is the enforcement of law, there is general agreement that police, at least in legitimate states, are servants of the law, and that behavior that conflicts with that role is, at least potentially, corrupt.
Second, there are disagreements about what might be called the scope of police corruption. Not every act that detracts from the effective functioning of a police service counts as police corruption.
For example, an ill-advised decision by police management to make use of the in itself legitimate strategy of saturation policing in a crime-ridden area exacerbates existing antagonism toward police by racial minorities, leading to riots and greater lawlessness. The decision makes the police service less effective than it should have been, but it is not an instance of corruption.
It is necessary, then, to find a definition of police corruption which is not unduly broad. In a relatively narrow construal, police corruption simply consists of misuse by police of their position to gain personal advantage. This construal still allows for differences about which behaviors are corrupt.
Some who hold this view consider that unlawful or unethical behavior should only be considered corrupt if it is motivated by the desire for personal gain, whether or not a benefit is actually received; others think that corrupt activity is identified by its outcome— corrupt activity produces a private benefit for a police officer or is a kind of activity that tends to produce such an outcome.
There are also differences about what kind of benefit counts: Clearly, many egregious instances of police corruption do involve police acting for personal advantage, and application of the personal advantage approach will identify many, at least, of the paradigm cases of police corruption.
Since noble cause corruption involves police deliberately breaking the law it surely counts as police corruption, though by definition it is not motivated by, and need not produce, personal benefit.
An alternative, broader approach understands corruption generally, and police corruption in particular, as what might be called a moralized causal concept.
Police corruption is behavior that corrodes, or has the tendency to corrode, a properly functioning police service, and for which the police officer s responsible can properly be blamed i. This approach, like the narrower approach, will identify police acting for personal advantage as instances of police corruption.
But it can also see other kinds of behavior by police, including noble cause corruption, as forms of police corruption. An advantage of the causal approach is its flexibility in determining what counts as police corruption.
In one social setting, for instance, acceptance by police of small gratuities from shopkeepers, such as food and drink, may compromise their willingness to take action when the shopkeepers break the law and so will count as corrupt.
In another setting, where there are different norms governing such interactions, and a more morally robust police service, acceptance of gratuities may have no such compromising effect and so will not count as corrupt.
Incidence and Effects Most police corruption is covert, or at least shielded from official scrutiny. Even when complaints are made, they are difficult to substantiate, often involving the word of the complainant against that of the police officer they are complaining about, and police complaints systems themselves are often less than ideal.
For reasons such as these, it is impossible to know exactly how common police corruption actually is.definition of Police corruption is a specific form of police misconduct designed to obtain financial gain, other personal gain, or career advancement for a police officer or officers in exchange for not pursuing, or selectively pursuing, an investigation or arrest.
Student research papers on liver disease quixotic and the human experience essay cleanliness in islam essay, father essay writing remeberance essay significant experience essay aluguel social essays verbal visual essay macbeth, admittance college essay eradicate corruption essay in english essay on traveling overseas dissertation lmu volleyball.
Police Corruption Introduction: What is Corruption, Corruption can be defined as the misuse of public power for private or personal profit. There are many causes of police corruption. Examples of Police Corruption, Police corruption occurs over many different areas of the law/5(8).
Essay on the Causes of Corruption – Corruption is like blood cancer. It has taken deep-roots in the country. Corruption in Indian public life is “all pervasive” and that businessmen, bureaucrats, contractors, industrialists, entrepreneurs, journalists, vice-chancellors, teachers, doctors.
Defining Police Corruption.
Corruption is a process of subversion or corrosion of a noncorrupt, pure, or ideal state of affairs. “Police corruption,” then, refers in the first instance to acts which undermine the proper functioning of a police service (and perhaps more broadly of the criminal justice system) and, derivatively, of the moral character of the police who engage in it.
Causes of producing corruption by police outside of the police station The figure shows that, in maximum time low salary is the main causes of police corruption.
In percentage percent (%) respondents said that low salary is the main cause of police corruption. percent (%) said lack of morality is a cause of police corruption.